Legal Opinion

Oneida Charter Township v. City of Grand Ledge

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 12, 2009No. Docket 277093PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This case requires us to decide whether MCL 123.141, which authorizes municipalities to contract for the sale of water outside their territorial limits, mandates that rates charged for the sale of water directly to extraterritorial individual inhabitants of a “contractual customer” be equal to the actual cost of service. The court below determined that it does not, and plaintiffs now appeal as of right. We disagree and hold that a municipality selling water extraterritorially directly to individual inhabitants of a “contractual customer” must charge actual costs pursuant to MCL 123.141(3).

I.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Koontz v. Ameritech Services, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Henderson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. City of Grand Rapids v. CrockerMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Mayor of Lansing v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2004

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tmw Enterprises Inc v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Wolverine Power Supply Cooperative, Inc v. Department of Environmental QualityMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. 2000 Baum Family Trust v. BabelMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API