Legal Opinion
In the Matter of an Application to Enforce an Administrative Subpoena of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Naji Robert Nahas
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 6, 1984No. 83-2313PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge TAMM.
TAMM, Circuit Judge:
This appeal concerns a federal district court’s jurisdiction under 7 U.S.C. § 15 (1982) to enforce an investigative subpoena served by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (Commission) on a foreign citizen in a foreign nation. Naji Robert Na-has, a citizen and resident of Brazil, was served in Brazil with a subpoena duces tecum issued by the Commission. The subpoena required Nahas to appear and produce documents at the Commission’s offices in Washington, D.C. Nahas did not comply with the subpoena, nor did he comply…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Baldwin v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Oetjen v. Central Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Murray v. Schooner Charming BetsySupreme Court of the United States · 1804
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Enforce Administrative Subpoenas Duces Tecum of the Securities & Exchange Commission v. KnowlesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. v. Islamic Republic of IranCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Sturdza v. United Arab EmiratesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Church of Scientology of California v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Klaus Zoelsch v. Arthur Andersen & CoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.