Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Catoe

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 23, 2001No. 25332PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter is before the Court on a Butler 1 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner, now on death row, 2 contends that errors in his capital sentencing proceeding warrant this Court’s exercise of the writ. We find that the Allen 3 charge given to petitioner’s sentencing jury was unconstitutionally coercive and “in the setting, constitute^] a denial of fundamental fairness shocking to the universal sense of justice.” Butler v. State, 802 S.C. 466, 468, 397 S.E.2d 87, 88 (1990). Accordingly, we grant the writ and remand for a new sentencing proceeding.

A. Facts

We have adopted, with…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Lowenfield v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Brasfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  2. McWee v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  3. Williams v. OzmintSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  4. State v. CottrellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  5. Workman v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API