Holt v. Henley
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Appeal from the 'District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk, in Bankruptcy.
1Per curiam
The able opinion of the learned judge below is reported in 190 Fed. 871. We agree with it. There are only two questions in the case. Union Trust Co. v. Southern Saw Mills Co., 166 Fed. 193, 92 C. C. A. 101, and Tippett & Wood v. Barham, 180 Fed. 76, 103 C. C. A. 430, an*1021swer one of them; the act of June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 838, c. 412), amendatory of the bankrupt law, the other. That act was intended to apply to every bankruptcy, the petition in which was filed after its passage. The conditional vendor in this case had not recorded his contract. By the law of Virginia, a lien creditor or a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Wilson v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Arbuckle Bros. v. Gates & BrownSupreme Court of Virginia · 1898
- In re Williamsburg Knitting MillDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1911
- Union Trust Co. v. Southern Sawmills & Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Holt v. HenleySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- In re MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
- In re Pittsburg-Big Muddy Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1914
- American Clay Machinery Co. v. Sedalia Brick & Tile Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913
- Elliott Mach. Co. v. CenterDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1915