Legal Opinion

Piantes v. Hayden-Stone, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1973No. 13143, 13144PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELLETT, Justice:

This is an action by plaintiffs to recover the consideration paid to Hayden-Stone, Inc., hereinafter called the defendant, for certain securities which defendant sold to them. 1

The defendant as a broker-dealer is registered in some 41 states of the Union, although not in Utah. Its office is located in San Diego, California. It claims it did no business in Utah and that it is immune from suit here. It also contends that if a rescission of any stock transaction is permitted, all transactions must be rescinded.

Our statute 2 requires a broker-dealer or agent to be registered…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mellott v. LoveMississippi Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Merchant v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1983
  2. Blue Sky L. Rep. P 72,056 Franklin P. Dixon and Mrs. Mae S. Merchant, Executors of the Last Will and Testament of W. Caton Merchant, Jr., Deceased v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., Franklin P. Dixon and Mrs. Mae S. Merchant, Executors of the Last Will and Testament of W. Caton Merchant, Jr., Deceased v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  3. Clemons v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  4. Dixon v. Oppenheimer & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  5. MacPeg Ross O'Connell & Goldhaber, Inc. v. CastelloDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API