Legal Opinion

Merchant v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided August 3, 1983No. Civ. A. 83-0134-RPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

MERHIGE, District Judge.

Plaintiff, a Virginia citizen, brings this action for breach of statutory contract and for recovery of a statutorily provided refund against Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., a Delaware corporation whose principal place of business is in New York. As the amount in controversy exceeds $10,000, the Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). The matter comes before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment. 1 There are no genuine issues of material fact, and the matter is ripe for disposition.

I. Undisputed Facts

Defendant is a broker-dealer within the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The Johns Hopkins University v. William E. HuttonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
  2. Street v. Consumers Mining Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1946
  3. Johns Hopkins University v. HuttonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1968
  4. Pollok v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
  5. Piantes v. Hayden-Stone, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. v. CullatherDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1987
  2. Kane v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  3. McCowan v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  4. Blue Sky L. Rep. P 72,056 Franklin P. Dixon and Mrs. Mae S. Merchant, Executors of the Last Will and Testament of W. Caton Merchant, Jr., Deceased v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., Franklin P. Dixon and Mrs. Mae S. Merchant, Executors of the Last Will and Testament of W. Caton Merchant, Jr., Deceased v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  5. Dixon v. Oppenheimer & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API