Legal Opinion

MacPeg Ross O'Connell & Goldhaber, Inc. v. Castello

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided April 30, 1988No. 86 CV 2817PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.

This action involves counterclaims under federal and state law. Defendants move for summary judgment to dismiss all of plaintiff’s claims and to award defendants judgment on one counterclaim. For the reasons discussed below, the motion is denied without prejudice.

FACTS

The defendants traded in stock options in accounts opened with plaintiff, a corporate broker-dealer. Unfortunately for defendants, their investment decisions proved less than astute and they sustained large losses. Unfortunately for plaintiff, its broker-employee who executed the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Randall v. LoftsgaardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Moerman v. Zipco, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1969
  3. A. B. PARVIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DAVIS OIL COMPANY Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. Dunwoody Country Club of Atlanta, Inc. v. FortsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  5. Robertson v. WhiteDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Blue Sky L. Rep. P 73,202 William H. Borthwick and Frances N. Borthwick v. First Georgetown Securities, Inc. And Darrell BrooksteinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  2. Sea Carriers Corp. v. EMPIRE PROGRAMS INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API