Legal Opinion
Underwriters at Interest on Cover Note JHB92M10582079 v. Nautronix, Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided April 10, 1996No. 95-20153PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT M. PARKER, Circuit Judge:
FACTS
Schahin Cury, a Brazilian company, owned the drill ship S.C. Lancer, which was chartered by another Brazilian company to conduct off-shore oil and gas well drilling. As part of the charter agreement, Schahin Cury was required to update the S.C. Lancer with a new dual computer dynamic positioning system (“DPS”). DPS is a complex device that holds the vessel in one place while the vessel does its drilling. Schahin Cury selected Nautronix, Ltd., an Australian corporation, to supply and install the DPS. Nautro- nix, Ltd. was to install the DPS, calibrate it,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- John W. Dussouy, Jr. v. Gulf Coast Investment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- The Chitimacha Tribe of Louisiana v. Harry L. Laws Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Baker v. Gold Seal Liquors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Allen v. Okam Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Broyles v. TexasDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
- Klamath Irrigation District v. the United States 01-591l and 01-5910l Through 01United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Chem One, Ltd. v. M/V Rickmers GenoaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Jefferson Marine Towing, Inc. v. Kostmayer Construction, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.