Legal Opinion

Agostini v. Colonial Trust Co.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided August 23, 1945PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pearson, Vice-Chancellor:

The gravamen of the complaint is that the provisions for interest in a loan agreement, bond and mortgage (complainants being the borrowers and defendant the lender) violate restrictions upon interest chargeable under the Delaware usury statute, Rev.Code of Del. 1935, § 3101, and are not authorized by the relevant section of the small loan act, Rev.Code, § 4047. Complainants charge that illegality stems from a provision for the deduction in advance of what amounts to “bank discount” at six per cent per annum for a period of three years computed upon the entire face…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cantor v. SachsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1932
  2. Agostini v. Colonial Trust Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1944
  3. Agostini v. Colonial Trust Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1944
  4. Doe v. RoeSuperior Court of Delaware · 1933
  5. Hall v. FeildSupreme Court of Delaware · 1795

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Greenbriar Condominium, Phase I, Council of Unit Owners, Inc. v. BrooksCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. City of National City v. WienerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. City of National City v. WienerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API