Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

City of National City v. Wiener

California Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1992No. S020887Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

MOSK, J., Concurring and Dissenting.

There are nine words in the majority opinion with which I agree: “the judgment of the Court of Appeal is reversed.” However, because the bulk of the opinion proposes to give effect to a city ordinance that unconstitutionally bans the dissemination of First Amendment-protected material, I must distance myself from its reasoning.

First, the facts.

At the time of trial, Chuck’s Bookstore was the only adult bookstore in National City—a city of more than 57,000—although there is one other sexually oriented business, a movie theater.

Purporting to rid itself of…

2Cases cited74 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API