Legal Opinion

DeClerk v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided March 19, 1980No. CA 79-200PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James H. Pilkinton, Judge.

Appellants and appellees own contiguous tracts of property situated in Randolph County, Arkansas. This case is a boundary line dispute between them. Involved also is whether or not there was a prescriptive easement across a portion of the real property claimed by appellees in the event the court should determine that the appellants were not the owners of the property across which they claim access to their land.

The Chancery Court found that the appellees had record title to the real property in question; and that the appellants had failed to show that they had…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Utley v. RuffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  2. Gibson v. HeimanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  3. Hill v. SurrattSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  4. Jones v. SewardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  5. Wilson v. BrandenburgSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Moses v. DautartasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Lammey v. EckelCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Clark v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
  4. Fulkerson v. Van BurenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Clark v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API