Jones v. Seward
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Frank Holt, Justice.
This appeal results from a decree holding that appellants and the appellees had agreed orally upon the location of a boundary line between their respective properties. Appellants contend the court’s finding was against the preponderance of the evidence in that the alleged agreement did not contain the necessary elements to make it a binding agreement and that no agreement was shown to have been made by appellant Blanche Jones.
In order for there to be a valid boundary line agreement, certain factors must be present: (1) there must be an uncertainty or dispute about the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fish v. BushSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- Fulwider v. WoodsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- Sherrin v. CoffmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
- Arnett v. LillardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- Bryson v. DillonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- DeClerk v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
- Nunley v. OrsburnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Fields v. GriffenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
- Jones v. SewardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Camp v. LiberatoreCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981