Gibson v. Heiman
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Frank Holt, Justice.
In an action on a written contract, appellant sought recovery of fees for his engineering and construction manager services provided to Max Heiman, deceased, in connection with the construction of a project known as Country Club Manor Apartments. Appellees, administrators of the estate of Heiman, denied liability on the basis that the contract was unreasonable and unconscionable. Also appellant had breached the contract by substantial nonperformance and, therefore, any recovery should be on a quantum meruit basis. The chancellor found that appellant did not completely…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Titan Oil & Gas, Inc. v. ShipleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
- Farmers Equipment Company v. MillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- Manhattan Factoring Corp. v. OrsburnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
- Wilkes v. StacySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
- Minton v. McGowanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Colegio de Ingenieros y Agrimensores de Puerto Rico v. Autoridad de Acueductos y Alcantarillados de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1992
- Winkle v. Grand National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Precision Steel Warehouse, Inc. v. Anderson-Martin MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Don Gilstrap Builders, Inc. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
- Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.