Legal Opinion
New West Charter Middle School v. Los Angeles Unified School District
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 8, 2010No. B215777PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
Proposition 39, approved in 2000, amended Education Code section 47614 to provide, in pertinent part, “Each school district shall make available, to each charter school operating in the school district, facilities sufficient for the charter school to accommodate all of the charter school’s in-district students in conditions reasonably equivalent to those in which the students would be accommodated if they were attending other public schools of the district.” (Ed. Code, § 47614, subd. (b).) Plaintiff and appellant New West Charter Middle School (New West) sought school…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marina View Heights Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- GHK Associates v. Mayer Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Los Angeles Police Protective League v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Jaramillo v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- SCI California Furneral Services, Inc. v. Five Bridges FoundationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Ginsberg v. GamsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- JMR Construction Corp. v. Environmental Assessment & Remediation Management, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- California Charter Schools Ass'n v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.