Legal Opinion
Maher v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 25, 2004No. SC 17001PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
The defendants, Ian M. Cohen, a physician, and his employer, Associated Women’s Health Specialists, P.C. (Associated Women’s Health),1 appeal2 from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the plaintiff, Linda Maher, following a jury trial. The defendants claim that the trial court improperly: (1) permitted the plaintiffs expert witness to testify regarding the issue of causation in violation of § 7-4 (b) of the Connecticut Code of Evidence3 and our opinion in State v. *157Porter, 241 Conn. 57, 698 A.2d 739 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058, 118 S. Ct. 1384, 140 L. Ed. 2d…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Connecticut v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. OquendoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. ReidSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. KirschSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. Chasity WestSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Sullivan v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Klein v. Norwalk HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.