Legal Opinion

McCrann v. Klaneckey

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided March 15, 1984No. 13-82-340-CVPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YOUNG, Justice.

Appellees brought this suit against appellant, an insurance agent, alleging violations of the Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA), TEX.BUS. & COM.CODE ANN. § 17.50(a) (Vernon Supp.1982-83). After a trial without a jury, the trial court found that appellees were entitled to recover treble damages plus attorney’s fees. Appellant contends on appeal (1) that appellees were not “consumers” under the DTPA and (2) that the evidence was insufficient to support the judgment. We affirm.

It is undisputed that appellees purchased automobile insurance through appellant from Forrest…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Cameron v. Terrell & Garrett, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Glover v. Texas General Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  4. White v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Ray v. Farmers' State Bank of HartTexas Supreme Court · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Brooks, Tarlton, Gilbert, Douglas & Kressler, Etc., Cross-Appellants v. United States Fire Insurance Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  2. HOW Insurance Co. v. Patriot Financial Services of Texas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. Showpiece Homes Corp. v. Assurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  4. Stevens v. Motorists Mutual Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Fairbanks v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API