Fairbanks v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KENNARD, J.
Enacted in 1970, the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (Civ. Code, § 1750 et seq.) prohibits specified unfair and deceptive acts and practices in a “transaction intended to result or which results in the sale or lease of goods or services to any consumer” (id., § 1770, subd. (a)). The question we decide here is whether life insurance is a “service” subject to the act’s remedial provisions. We conclude that it is not. As this is consistent with the Court of Appeal’s decision, we affirm its judgment.
I
In November 2003, plaintiff Pauline Fairbanks filed a complaint in superior court,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Miklosy v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. KnollerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Cates Construction, Inc. v. Talbot PartnersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Goodman v. LozanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Barry v. State Bar of Cal.California Supreme Court · 2017
- Kaldenbach v. Mutual of Omaha Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Gutierrez v. Carmax Auto Superstores Cal., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- McHugh v. Protective Life Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 2021
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.