Legal Opinion
Jones v. Le May-Lieb Corp.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided September 13, 1938PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.
The facts in so far as they expressly appear are contained in a so called “case stated,” which, however, in reality is an agreement as to certain subsidiary facts with the right to offer further evidence. Frati v. Jannini, 226 Mass. 430. The subsidiary facts agreed upon, which are decisive of the case, are these: On Saturday, November 30, 1935, the plaintiff purchased of the defendant, a dealer in automobiles, a De Soto automobile for $695 in payment of which sum he left with the defendant his Chrysler automobile, valued by the parties at $245, and his check for the balance of $450. On the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Frati v. JanniniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Lowe v. HarwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
- Putnam v. GliddenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
- First Nat. Bank of Litchfield v. Pipe & Contractors' Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Calvin Hosmer, Stolte Co. v. Paramount Cone Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Scaccia v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Nevins v. WardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Food Specialties, Inc. v. John C. Dowd, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- City of Cambridge v. Town of West SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Akron Brick & Block Co. v. Moniz Engineering Co., Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.