Legal Opinion
Gropp v. District of Columbia Board of Dentistry
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 7, 1992No. 90-1519PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KING, Associate Judge:
Petitioner, Dr. Stephen Gropp, challenges the findings of the District of Columbia Board of Dentistry (hereinafter the Board) for revoking his license to practice in the District of Columbia and barring him from applying for reinstatement for two years. The Board instituted action against petitioner pursuant to D.C.Code § 2-3305.-14(a)(13) (1988 Repl.) by filing one charge of submitting false statements to collect fees for services which were not provided. Two specifications stem from that charge. Specification A refers to insurance claims submitted in 1985 to the Pilot…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Schweiker v. HansenSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. MirandaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hutchinson v. District of Columbia Office of Employee AppealsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Robinson v. SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Duk Hea Oh v. National Capital Revitalization Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Compton v. District of Columbia Board of PsychologyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Weston Forest & Trail Ass'n v. FishmanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.