Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re: Madison Guaranty Savings & Loan (Lewinsky Fee Application)

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 30, 2003No. Division 94-1PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Special Court filed PER CURIAM.

2Per curiam

ORDER

This matter coming to be heard and being heard before the Special Division of the Court upon the application of Monica Lewinsky for reimbursement of attorneys’ fees and costs pursuant to section 593(f) of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, as amended, 28 U.S.C. § 591 et seq. (2000), and it appearing to the court for the reasons set forth more fully in the opinion filed contemporaneously herewith that the petition is not well taken, it is hereby

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the petition of Monica Lewinsky for attorneys’ fees that she…

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re Raymond J. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  2. In Re Oliver L. North (Dutton Fee Application)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
  3. In Re Edwin Meese IIICourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
  4. In Re Franklyn C. NOFZIGERCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
  5. In Re Samuel R. PIERCE, Jr. (Kisner Fee Application)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. FishmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  2. High Desert Relief, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  3. In Re: Madison Guaranty Savings & LoanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  4. In re Madison Guaranty Savings & LoanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  5. In Re: Madison Guaranty Savings & LoanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API