Legal Opinion

In Re Edwin Meese III

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 12, 1990No. Division 87-1PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Per curiam

On May 11, 1987 the Acting Attorney General, by letter, referred the matter of Attorney General Edwin Meese III and his association with several individuals involved in “Welbilt Electronic Die Corporation,” also known as Wedtech Corporation, to Independent Counsel James C. McKay, Esquire for investigation (hereafter “the referral”). The referral followed immediately upon a letter request by Meese dated the same date as the referral. At the time of the referral Mr. McKay was conducting an investigation into Franklyn C. Nofziger’s representation of Wedtech Corporation and Comet Rice, Inc. 1…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Savin v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  2. Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless v. HustedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  3. Role Models Amer Inc v. White, ThomasCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
  4. In Re Oliver L. North (Bush Fee Application)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
  5. In Re Oliver L. North (Dutton Fee Application)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API