Legal Opinion
United States v. 431.60 ACRES OF LAND, RICHMOND CTY., GA.
District Court, S.D. Georgia
Decided February 1, 1973No. Civ. A. 1487PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ALAIMO, District Judge.
The amount of “reasonable costs, disbursements, and expenses, including reasonable attorney, appraisal, and engineering fees actually incurred” 1 required to be reimbursed to the owner of land, the condemnation of which has been abandoned by the United States of America, is before the Court for decision.
In the fall of 1969, Georgia Vitrified Brick and Clay Company (condemnee above), learning that the Government was going to condemn its interest in certain lands, employed the law firm of Sanders, Hester, Holley, Ashmore & Boozer to protect its interests.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dohany v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Chicago & Southern Traction Co. v. FlahertyIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
- Franklin-McKinley School District v. LesterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. 122.00 Acres of Land, More or Less, Located in Koochiching County, Minnesota and the Estate of Agnes J. Rudser RingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. 4.18 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in Idaho County, State of Idaho, and Scott Stanford HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. 243.538 Acres of Land, More or Less, in the County of MauiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1981
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority v. Airport Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.