Legal Opinion

Franklin-McKinley School District v. Lester

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 16, 1963No. Civ. 21173PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAgee, J.

Plaintiff’s original complaint sought to condemn certain land owned by defendants for use as a school site. Thereafter, an amended complaint changed the location of the land to be condemned to another site, also owned by defendants.

The parties agreed that such an amendment constituted an abandonment of the proceeding as to the original site (County of Kern v. Galatas, 200 Cal.App.2d 353, 357 [19 Cal.Rptr. 348]) and that by reason thereof defendants became entitled to the costs provided for in section 1255a of the Code of Civil Procedure.

This section provides that, upon abandonment, “a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. County of Kern v. GalatasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. City of Long Beach v. O'DonnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. City of Los Angeles v. WelshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Salton Bay Marina, Inc. v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Merced Irrigation District v. WoolstenhulmeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Vella v. HudginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Hutterli v. State Conservation CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Renfrew v. LoysenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API