Legal Opinion

Bair v. Callahan

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided February 25, 2011No. CIV. 4:09-cv-04009-RALPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL

ROBERTO A. LANGE, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This Court held a jury trial in this case from August 31 to September 3, 2010. The jury found that the Defendant, orthopedic surgeon Dr. Robert A. Callahan, was not negligent in his treatment of Plaintiff Robin Bair. The treatment in question included a spinal surgery involving placement of pedicle screws and rods into Mr. Bair’s back. Plaintiffs moved for a new trial under Rule 59 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, based on two arguments:

1. Plaintiffs were prejudiced by the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. moses.com Securities, Inc. v. Comprehensive Software Systems, Inc. William W. Simpson Southwest Securities, Inc. David Glatstein David ZeleniakCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. Gregory Jacen SykesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Lorenzo WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. Silvio Perez RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API