Legal Opinion
State v. Allan
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 20, 2011No. AC 32125PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALVORD, J.
The defendant, Nemiah Allan, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of conspiracy to sell narcotics by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48 and 21a-278 (b). On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly denied his motion for a judgment of acquittal. Specifically, he argues that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction, and, therefore, he was deprived of his federal due process rights. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could have found the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. GeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- United States v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- State v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
- State v. FordeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. AllanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- State v. AllanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- State v. AllanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014