Legal Opinion
Sarah M. BOONE, Appellant v. Jo Anne BARNHART Commissioner of Social Security
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 19, 2004No. 02-3256PublishedCited by 146 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
AMBRO, Circuit Judge.
Sarah M. Boone challenges the Social Security Commissioner’s determination that she is not disabled and therefore not entitled to Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) disability benefits. She makes several arguments, each of which pertains to the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) determination that she can perform work that exists in significant numbers in the regional or national economy. 1 We agree with Boone that the record lacks substantial evidence that she can perform such work and, thus, is not disabled. We therefore reverse and remand.
BACKGROUN…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Tommaso Fargnoli v. Larry G. Massanari, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Albert Shaw v. Shirley S. Chater, as Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Peggy Mayes v. Larry G. Massanari, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Joseph BURNS, Appellant v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by146 opinions
- Joyce A. Rutherford v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Overman v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Banks v. ASTUREDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Callahan v. AstrueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Tauber v. BarnhartDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2006
141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.