Legal Opinion
Callahan v. Astrue
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 9, 2011No. Civil Action 09-0905 (RMU)PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting the Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment of Reversal; Denying The Commissioner’s Motion For Judgment of Affirmance
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiff, Christopher Callahan, commenced this action against the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”), seeking to overturn the Commissioner’s decision to deny him disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income benefits under the Social Security Act (“the Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 301 et seq. Specifically, the plaintiff challenges the Commissioner’s decision to affirm a ruling by…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Podedworny v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Hackett v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Goodman v. ColvinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Davis v. BerryhillDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Callaway v. BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Johnson v. ColvinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Campfield v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.