United Farm Agency v. Malanuk
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell, Justice:
This is an action for a real estate commission on the sale of a house. The parties waived a jury trial, and the trial court awarded the respondent broker a commission of $5,250 plus costs. We affirm as modified.
In an action at law tried by the judge without a jury, his factual findings have the same force as a jury verdict and are conclusive on appeal unless found to be without evidentiary support or controlled by an error of law. Snell v. Parlette, 273 S. C. 317, 256 S. E. (2d) 410 (1979).
The appellants Robert and Mary Malanuk put their home on the market and posted a “For…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Champion v. WhaleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Hutson v. StoneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
- Carter v. McCallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
- Cleveland Williams v. ButlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
- Snell v. ParletteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hilton Head Island Realty, Inc. v. Skull Creek ClubCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- Jones v. LeaganCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
- Eastern Commercial Realty Corp. v. FuscoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- Chambers v. PingreeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
- Century 21 Horton Real Estate, Inc. v. SokcevicCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.