Legal Opinion

Hutson v. Stone

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 11, 1922No. 10847PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Marion.

The appeal is from judgment on order of nonsuit in action by plaintiff, to recover the sum of $1,000 as compensation for services as real estate broker, in negotiating a sale of the dwell Hotel property in the city of Aiken.

One of the defendants, Dr. T. C. Stone, of Greenville, S. C., for himself and the' other owners, listed this property for sale with three independent real estate brokers, namely, S. J. Brooks, Mrs. Eulalie Salley, and the plaintiff, O. B. Hutson. No exclusive agency was given either of the brokers, a fact of which…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Edwards v. PikeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. Ward v. FletcherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  4. Fairly v. Wappoo MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895
  5. Beougher v. ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Keener v. ClevelandTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  2. Rieffer v. HollingsworthDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
  3. Howard & Foster Co. v. Citizens Nat. BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  4. Gantt v. MorganSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
  5. Webb v. FIRST FED. S & L ASSOC. OF ANDERSONCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API