Legal Opinion

United States v. Illig

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 15, 1920No. 425PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMSON, District Judge.

We have before us for consideration a motion to quash an information made by the United States attorney, charging the defendant with violation of the Volstead Act (41 Stat. 305), in nine separate counts. The information was drawn at a time in the early enforcement of the Volstead Act, when,'in an earnest effort to enforce the Eighteenth Amendment, other constitutional amendments and legal principles of basic importance seemed to have been overlooked. In order to intelligently pass upon the motion to quash, it is necessary to consider certain fundamental propositions,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Pettibone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. United States v. CarllSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. In Re BonnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. United States v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Albrecht v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  3. United States v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1944
  4. Farinelli v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
  5. People v. RuddickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API