Farinelli v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the Southern District of California. Joseph Barinelli and another were convicted of violating the National Prohibition Act, and the named defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
GIDBERT, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in error and Pat Bowes were jointly charged by information with violations of sections 3 and 21, title 2, of the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. Ann. Bupp. *1991923, §§ 10138%aa, 1013S%jj). Attached to the information was the affidavit of a federal prohibition agent, deposing that the matters and things therein contained were “true in substance and in fact” In the affidavit the information is referred to as “the foregoing information charging Pat Bowes with violation of section 3,” etc., and the name of the plaintiff in error does not appear in the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Weeks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- Kelly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1918
- Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1919
- United States v. McDonaldDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1923
- Abbott Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Albrecht v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Wagner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Dismone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Radich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
- Schmidt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.