Legal Opinion
Deegan v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 23, 2006No. A05-24Published
1Opinion of the Court
711 N.W.2d 89 (2006)
Daniel DEEGAN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Minnesota, Respondent.
No. A05-24.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
March 23, 2006.
Mark D. Nyvold, St. Paul, MN, for appellant.
Mike Hatch, Attorney General, John S. Garry, Assistant Attorney General, St. Paul, MN, Alan L. Mitchell, St. Louis County Attorney, Duluth, MN, for respondent.
Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.
OPINION
HANSON, Justice.
We review the question of whether Minn.Stat. § 590.05 (2004) violates the United States or Minnesota Constitutions because it provides that a petitioner who pleaded guilty, received no…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Halbert v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.