Legal Opinion

Horan & Co. v. Republic Insurance Group

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 20, 1988No. 3-88-0016PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wombacher

The defendant appeals the trial court’s judgment holding the plaintiff was entitled to be defended and indemnified by the defendant.

The plaintiff, Horan and Company, owned the real estate on which was located an establishment known as E.T.’s Spirits and Stuff (E.T.’s). E.T.’s requested a liability insurance policy from the Hawk Agency, Inc. (Hawk). Hawk, an independent insurance agent, is not employed by any particular company, including Republic Insurance Group (Republic), the defendant in this case. Hawk dealt directly with Republic’s general agent, Insurance Management, Inc. (IMI), rather…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Garland A. Holbrook and Truck Acceptance Corporation v. Institutional Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
  2. Conley v. RatayzcakAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. Bull v. MitchellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  4. Kerr v. PusateriAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Textile Maintenance v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  2. Yunker v. Farmers Automobile Management Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  3. S.M. Acquisition Co. v. Euler American Credit Indemnity Co. (In Re S.M. Acquisition Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
  4. Verkruysse v. NeeseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. Textile Maintenance v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API