Legal Opinion

Verkruysse v. Neese

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 2, 1993No. Nos. 3-92-0933, 3-93-0117 consPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stouder

Third-party defendant-appellant, Illinois Employers Insurance of Wausau (Wausau), appeals from the granting of summary judgment motions in favor of plaintiff/counterdefendant-appellee, Kenneth Verkruysse, d/b/a Portland Truck, Trailer & Equipment Sales (Portland), and defendants/counterclaimants/third-party plaintiffs-appellees, Carl Neese, Ronald N. Kimball and Howard Neese, d/b/a Neese-Kimball Insurance Agency (Neese-Kimball). We affirm.

The record shows Portland filed a four-count complaint against Neese-Kimball, Portland’s insurance broker, alleging various wrongful actions resulting in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Continental Mobile Telephone Co. v. Chicago S M S a Ltd. PartnershipAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  2. Conley v. RatayzcakAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. ElderIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Johnston v. Tri-City Blacktop, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. Horan & Co. v. Republic Insurance GroupAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eyrich v. Estate of WaldemarAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  2. Estate of WaldemarAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  3. Eyrich v. Estate of WaldemarAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API