Legal Opinion

Yunker v. Farmers Automobile Management Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 9, 2010No. 3—09—0417, 3—09—0521 consPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Brien

Plaintiffs and cross-appellees Maggie Yunker and Keith Yunker filed this action against defendant and cross-appellant Farmers Automobile Management Corp., d/b/a Pekin Insurance Co., seeking a declaration of coverage for injuries Maggie sustained in an August 2006 automobile accident. The trial court granted Pekin’s motion for summary judgment, finding that the policy at issue had expired at the time of Maggie’s accident due to nonpayment of the renewal premium. The Yunkers appealed the grant of summary judgment. Pekin thereafter filed a motion for sanctions, which the trial court denied.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. American States Insurance v. KolomsIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Marsh v. Evangelical Covenant ChurchIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Peterson v. RandhavaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  4. John G. Phillips & Associates v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Pekin Insurance v. MillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Benson v. StaffordAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  2. Garlick v. Bloomingdale TownshipAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
  3. Nelson v. Chicago Park DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  4. Enbridge Pipeline (Illinois), LLC v. HokeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
  5. Enbridge Pipeline (Illinois), LLC v. HokeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API