Legal Opinion

Stratton v. Rollings

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1940PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed December 3, 1940:

Rosenberry, C. J.

The language of the will upon its face is plain and unambiguous. Evidence was offered upon the hearing with respect to' the names and residences of the surviving heirs and their social relations with the deceased, which was received over the objection of the coadministra-tors. It is considered that the court properly received this evidence.

Appellants contend that under sec. 238.13, Stats., the property should be divided between the nephews and nieces who were living and the issue of those nephews and nieces who are deceased,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williams v. ParsonsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Bloch v. BlochWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Rose Marie Wheaton, and Douglas Wheaton and Daniel WheatonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  2. Mahon v. Security First National BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Estate of FarberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. McElligott v. MurrayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. McElligott v. MurrayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API