Legal Opinion
Fordice Construction Co. v. Central States Dredging Co.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided April 11, 1986No. Civ. A. W84-0132(B)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BARBOUR, District Judge.
The Court has before it, in this diversity action, the Motion of Defendants, Central States Dredging Company (“Central States”) and APAC-Tennessee, Inc. (“APAC”), for Summary Judgment. The issue presented by Defendants' Motion is whether Plaintiff, Fordice Construction Company (“Fordice”), the second low bidder on a government procurement contract set aside for small businesses, can assert state law claims for unjust enrichment and fraud against Central States, the successful low bidder, and APAC, Central States’ subcontractor and alleged…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Iconco, a Corporation, and Cross-Appellant v. Jensen Construction Company, a Corporation, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- Hults v. TillmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
- MAGNOLIA FED. S & L ASSOCIATION v. Randal Craft Realty Co., Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1977
- Tectonics, Inc. Of Florida v. Castle Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Dorsey Mississippi Sales, Inc. v. NewellMississippi Supreme Court · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Owens Corning v. RJ Reynolds Tobacco Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2004
- Connelly Containers, Inc. v. BernardDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Integrity Management International, Inc. v. Tombs & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Integrity Management International, Inc. v. Tombs & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Nationwide Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc. v. Trotwood Heating, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.