Legal Opinion

Penning v. Reid

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 17, 1932No. 13492PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice StabeEr.

We have made a careful and painstaking study of the questions involved in this appeal, and are satisfied with and approve the conclusions arrived at by Judge Johnson in his very full and well-considered decree.

With respect to the necessity for a “nulla bona return,” a novel question is presented under the special facts of this case; and while the general rule is as stated in Temple v. Montgomery, 157 S. C., 85, 153 S. E., 640, we think, in line with the great weight of authority, that an exception to this rule arose under the facts…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Temple v. MontgomerySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Future Group, II v. NationsbankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  2. Black v. Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  3. Dufresne v. Regency Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  4. Bakst v. Probst (In Re Amelung)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2010
  5. Tuller v. Nantahala Park Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API