Legal Opinion

Kruse v. Blair

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1928PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

Blair did not pay the rent for March, April, May, June and July, 1926, but kept possession of the premises during that time. Shortly after the suit for cancellation of the mortgage and lease was instituted Kruse commenced a suit to foreclose his mortgage, and these two suits were consolidated. A decree was entered providing that $498.54 of the money that was paid into court should be paid and applied on the judgment, leaving $300 to apply on rent. Kruse, through his attorney, later applied to the Circuit Court and an ex parte order was entered authorizing the payment of the $300 on hand…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hill v. Hill Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hamlen v. Rednalloh Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Tyner v. AxtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Reeves v. BakerOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Pratt v. McNally-Rathbone, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. Shlim v. Alimeg, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API