Legal Opinion

Matlock v. Simpson

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1995PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WM. H.D. FONES, Sr., Special Judge.

This is a will contest brought by the son and daughter of the testator, L.T. Matlock. His attorney, Paul Simpson, drafted the will and was the principal beneficiary and executor. The jury found in favor of the will. The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded for a new trial, holding that the jury instructions contained two errors. First, the trial judge gave an instruction that submitted to the jury the determination of whether or not a confidential relationship existed between the testator and his lawyer, that relationship having been established as…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kelly v. AllenTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Turner v. LeathersTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Richmond v. ChristianTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Roberts v. ChaseCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1942
  5. Nicholson v. ShockeySupreme Court of Virginia · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Childress v. CurrieTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Fell v. RamboCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  3. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. JeffersonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
  4. Kelley v. JohnsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
  5. Betty Goff C. Cartwright v. Jackson Capital Partners, Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2015

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API