Legal Opinion

Godchaux Sugars, Inc. v. Meridian Wholesale Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 4, 1923No. 4017PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). No evidence adduced supported the averments of the third above mentioned plea. Uncontradicted evidence showed that defendant received and accepted part of the sugar called for by the report of sale dated May 27, and for part of the sugar so accepted paid the price stated in that instrument, “28% net cash f. o. b. refinery.” Evidently that plea was based upon the provision of the Mississippi statute of frauds which in effect requires, as to a contract for the sale of personal property, goods, wares, or merchandise for the price of $50 or upwards, some note…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Bibb v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Luckenbach S. S. Co. v. W. R. Grace & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1920
  4. Garfield v. ParisSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Board of Trustees for Regina Public School Dist. No. 4 of Saskatchewan v. SpitzerDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1919

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. John Nicholas, Trustee v. Peter Pan Snack Shop, Inc., and Lanrose, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  2. Lamborn v. BlattnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1925
  3. United States v. DermanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1946
  4. C. G. Ball (Margaret Eliza Ball, Temporary Administratrix, Etc., Substituted in Place of C. G. Ball, Deceased) v. Victor Adding MacHine CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  5. C. G. Ball (Margaret Eliza Ball, Temporary Administratrix, Etc., Substituted in Place of C. G. Ball, Deceased) v. Victor Adding MacHine CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API