Legal Opinion

United States v. Felipe Zepeda-Martinez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 13, 2006No. 05-50562PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Senior Circuit Judge:

In United States v. Covian-Sandoval, 462 F.3d 1090 (9th Cir.2006), we determined that Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000) prevents a sentencing court from enhancing an alien’s sentence based upon a removal subsequent to a prior conviction unless that removal has been admitted by the defendant or proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. Covian-Sandoval, 462 F.3d at 1097. We now must decide whether harmless error review applies to such an error when the issue has properly been raised below. In light of the Supreme Court’s…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Butler v. CurryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. Salazar-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. Candelario Silvestre Beltran-MunguiaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Roberto LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API