United States v. Felipe Zepeda-Martinez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, Senior Circuit Judge:
In United States v. Covian-Sandoval, 462 F.3d 1090 (9th Cir.2006), we determined that Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000) prevents a sentencing court from enhancing an alien’s sentence based upon a removal subsequent to a prior conviction unless that removal has been admitted by the defendant or proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. Covian-Sandoval, 462 F.3d at 1097. We now must decide whether harmless error review applies to such an error when the issue has properly been raised below. In light of the Supreme Court’s…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Butler v. CurryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Salazar-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Candelario Silvestre Beltran-MunguiaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Roberto LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.