Legal Opinion

State v. Reinheimer

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 28, 1899PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from Linn District Court. — HoN. H. M. Remley, Judge. DEFENDANT was indicted, tried, and convicted of tbe crime of seduction, and from tbe judgment imposed appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.

Tbe accused is charged with having seduced one Nora Dixon-on or about December 25, 1896. A witness with whom tbe prosecutrix was stopping at tbe time she claims to have been seduced testified to certain facts tending to show she (tbe prosecutrix) was enceinte in February of tbe year 1896, and then said: “I say she was in a delicate condition because she was sick tbe same that 1 any woman is; that is, sick in that way.” On motion of tbe stale, tbe court struck out the conclusion of tbe witness that prosecutrix was in a delicate condition, but allowed her testimony as to the fact of her…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. HaydenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  2. State v. CurranSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  3. State v. WiseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  4. State v. McClinticSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  5. State v. PrizerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Ford v. DilleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  2. State v. KnoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  3. State v. SalingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  4. State v. PellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  5. State v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API