Gradford v. Nicholas Concrete Equipment Co.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
SAM A. BEATTY, Retired Justice.
The plaintiff, Perry S. Gradford, appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion for a new trial. Gradford contends that he is entitled to a new trial because, he says, the trial court incorrectly charged the jury as to *146his burden of proof. Our supreme- court transferred the appeal to this court pursuant to § 12-2-7(6), Ala.Code 1975. We affirm.
Gradford was injured on the job when the boom from a concrete pumping truck broke and fell onto him. Hé sued Nicholas Concrete Equipment Company, Inc. (“Nicholas”), alleging negligence and wantonness regarding its…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Shoals Ford, Inc. v. ClardySupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Phillips Colleges of Alabama v. LesterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Jones v. ButtsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
- Paschal v. NixonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ex Parte GradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- Ex Parte GradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- Gradford v. Nichols Concrete Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997