Legal Opinion

Paschal v. Nixon

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided July 15, 1994No. AV93000106PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judy Paschal filed this action against Lashana Nixon as a result of an automobile accident that occurred in July 1990. Following a jury trial, a verdict was returned for Paschal in the amount of $2,500. Paschal moved for a new trial, based on inadequacy of damages. The motion was denied. Paschal appeals.

The issue before this court is whether the trial court erred in refusing to grant a new trial for inadequacy of damages. Nixon did not file a cross appeal. Therefore, liability is not at issue.

The assessment of damages is a matter within the jury's discretion. Thompson v. Cooper, 551 So.2d…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thompson v. CooperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Nichols v. PerrymanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Smith v. DarringCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  2. Vincent v. First Alabama BankCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  3. Daniel v. AdkinsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  4. Gradford v. Nicholas Concrete Equipment Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  5. Caplan v. BenatorCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API