Paschal v. Nixon
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Judy Paschal filed this action against Lashana Nixon as a result of an automobile accident that occurred in July 1990. Following a jury trial, a verdict was returned for Paschal in the amount of $2,500. Paschal moved for a new trial, based on inadequacy of damages. The motion was denied. Paschal appeals.
The issue before this court is whether the trial court erred in refusing to grant a new trial for inadequacy of damages. Nixon did not file a cross appeal. Therefore, liability is not at issue.
The assessment of damages is a matter within the jury's discretion. Thompson v. Cooper, 551 So.2d…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Thompson v. CooperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Nichols v. PerrymanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992
3Cited by11 opinions
- Smith v. DarringCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
- Vincent v. First Alabama BankCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
- Daniel v. AdkinsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
- Gradford v. Nicholas Concrete Equipment Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
- Caplan v. BenatorCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.