Legal Opinion
Bannum, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 12, 2014No. 1:14-cv-00140PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL
WILLIAMS, Judge.
This bid protest comes before the Court on Defendant’s and Intervenor’s motions to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1). Plaintiff, Bannum, Inc. (“Bannum”), challenges the terms of a solicitation issued by the United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) and BOP’s award of a contract to Intervenor Dismas Charities, Inc. (“Dismas”). Bannum argues that the solicitation was defective because BOP required compliance with the Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 (“PREA”) without giving guidance regarding the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Information Technology & Applications Corporation v. United States, and Rs Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- American Auto Logistics, Lp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Sotera Defense Solutions, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Remote Diagnostic Technologies LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- US Securities Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.