Turner v. Whisted
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partEldridge, Judge
I concur with the Court’s judgment remanding this case for a determination of whether Mr. Turner is entitled to blood tests in order to establish his paternity. I do not agree, however, with the majority’s statement that when two men claim paternity of a child, their dispute is more appropriately resolved under the Maryland Code (1974,1991 Repl.Vol.), § 1-201 et seq. of the Estates and Trusts Article, rather than the Code (1984,1991 Repl.Vol.), § 5-1001 et seq. of the Family Law Article. In addition, I dissent from the Court’s position that Mr. Turner must prove that a declaration of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ross v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Ross v. PickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
- Cortese v. CorteseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Bridges v. NicelyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Hutzell v. BoyerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.