Legal Opinion

Lee v. Zentz

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 12, 1945No. 326PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

The action below involved claims arising from alleged violations of the District of Columbia Emergency Rent Act. After the case had been continued several times at the instance of defendant, a request by defendant’s counsel for a further continuance was denied; and, following a hearing in defendant’s absence, judgment for plaintiff was entered. Four days later defendant moved to vacate the judgment, alleging that her absence from the trial was due to illness. The motion was accompanied by defendant’s affidavit and a physician’s certificate. The trial court granted the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Jacobsen v. JacobsenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  3. Silverberg v. DearholtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
  4. Kummer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
  5. Beighle v. Le RoyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Borden v. BordenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Whitman v. NoelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
  3. Harco, Inc. v. Greenville Steel and Foundry CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. Mindell v. GlennDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. Bradley v. Triplex Shoe Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API