Legal Opinion

Visco v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 23, 1985No. Appeal, No. 3417 C.D 1983PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Senior Judge Kalish,

This is an appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County sustaining the preliminary objections of the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (DOT) and dismissing the petition of Eugene L. and Michael Visco (appellants) for the appointment of a board, of view.1

What we are concerned with in this case is a situation where a governmental agency such as DOT, although clothed with the power of eminent domain, but prior to its formal exercise, engaged in conduct which the property owner contends impinged upon the beneficial use of his…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Conroy-Prugh Glass Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Commonwealth's Crosstown Expressway AppealCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. In re RamseyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Commonwealth AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Hazleton Redevelopment Authority v. HudockCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Adams Outdoor Adv., Lp. v. Zoning Hearing Bd. of Smithfield TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. McGaffic v. RED. AUTH., CITY OF N. CASTLECommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Genter v. Blair County Convention and Sports Facilities AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Williams v. Borough of BlakelyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Gaughen v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API