Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Ohio Historical Society v. State Employment Relations Board

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1990No. 88-1523Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHolmes, J.

I concur in the judgment of the majority which affirms the judgment of the court of appeals that permits Ohio Historical Society (“OHS”) to maintain a declaratory judgment action in the trial court in order to determine whether the State Employment Relations Board (“SERB”) properly concluded it was a “public employer” for purposes of R..C. Chapter 4117. As the court of appeals noted, “[i]nasmuch as the trial court’s decision to grant or deny declaratory relief is usually a discretionary one, this matter must be reversed and remanded to that court to allow it to reconsider its action and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Hamilton County Board of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities v. Professionals Guild of OhioOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Panama City v. FLA. PUB. EMP. REL. COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  4. Renton Education Ass'n v. Washington State Public Employment Relations CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  5. Harrison v. Labor Relations CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API